In a landmark decision, the UK courts have issued their first-ever compulsory mediation order, signalling a major shift in how disputes may be resolved going forward.
The case in question, DKH Retail Limited, C-Retail Limited, Supergroup Internet Limited, Superdry Plc v City Football Group Limited, is a high-profile trademark dispute where the court has mandated mediation—even though one party objected. This sets a strong precedent, reinforcing the courts’ view that mediation is not just an option but, in some cases, an obligation.
Why does this matter?
🔹 Courts are taking a firmer stance on mediation, making it increasingly difficult to refuse without consequences.
🔹 Cost implications—refusing to mediate can carry financial risks if the court deems a party unreasonable.
🔹 More opportunities to resolve disputes efficiently—reducing time, cost, and uncertainty compared to litigation.
Case Study below
Hi Zachary
Well done to you for seeking mediation. I’m delighted to have been helpful. I’m aware how frequent disputes occur in your trade so please feel free to share my link below with your colleagues
https://consult-smp.com/archive/category/mediation
Prevention is better than cure!
Cheers
Clive
On 2025-04-12 11:01, Worthing Decorating wrote:
Dear Clive
Thank you for your time. Mr & Mrs L have decided to pay my bill in full
I would like to save you as a contact should something like this ever happen again.
Kindest regards
Zachary
(Worthing Decorating)
On 11 Apr 2025, at 11:11, clive@consult-smp.com wrote:
Hi Zachary
I confirm my mediation fees are £100 per hour plus VAT due in advance for each party
I usually need no more than 4 hours to resolve
eg attached case study
kind regards
Clive
sender Clive@consult-smp.com
Strategic Management Partners Ltd
www.consult-smp.com